How we audit a 3PL invoice

Most audit tools ask you to trust a number. We think you should be able to check ours — and so should your 3PL. This page explains, in plain language, exactly how SlashWith decides what to call a billing error, how AI is (and isn't) used, and why our numbers are deliberately conservative.

The three sources of truth

Every conclusion comes from comparing three things:

  1. What you agreed to pay — your rate card, MSA, amendments, and any written concessions from your provider, in strict order of precedence (a signed amendment beats the original rate card; a document always beats an AI's interpretation).
  2. What you were billed — every invoice line, normalized into standard charge categories, with each line traceable back to the exact page, row, or cell it came from.
  3. What actually happened — your Shopify orders, fulfillments, cancellations, and returns, matched to invoice activity by order references and tracking numbers, deterministically before anything probabilistic.

What “verified” means — and what it doesn't

We classify every result into one of five categories, and we never blend them into one headline number:

ClassMeaning
VerifiedThe contract, the invoice, and any required operational evidence are all present, the calculation is exact, and nothing material is unresolved. This is the only class we present as recoverable dollars.
Needs verificationLikely an issue, but one fact is unresolved — and we tell you exactly which fact and what would resolve it.
OptimizationA contractually valid charge you could reduce by changing process, packaging, or terms. Real money, but not an error.
In your 3PL's favorUnderbilling. Yes, we report it. An audit that only ever finds errors in one direction isn't an audit.
Data qualityThe sources conflict or are incomplete, so no reliable conclusion exists. We say so instead of guessing.
The rule we run the company on: a missed issue is bad; a confidently invented issue is worse. When in doubt, a finding is downgraded, never upgraded.

How AI is constrained

AI is very good at reading messy documents and very bad at being accountable for arithmetic. So we split the job:

Why “flagged” and “recovered” are different numbers

Some audit vendors advertise everything they flag as if it were money in your pocket. We track the full journey separately: identified → verified → disputed → acknowledged by your provider → credited on an actual invoice. Fees on recovery, where they apply, are computed only on credits that verifiably landed — and our public numbers count only that last stage.

Dispute windows: the clock your contract started

Most 3PL agreements limit how long you have to dispute an invoice — often 30 to 90 days. We extract that clause first, stamp every finding as inside or outside its window, audit your most recent invoices first, and never present time-barred findings as recoverable. (They're still useful — as evidence for your next rate negotiation.)

What happens when we find nothing

You get a reconciliation statement: how many lines were checked, against which rate-card version, what percentage of spend was covered, and what remained unresolved. It is not a guarantee or an attestation — it's a precise description of what was verified. Many merchants file it with each month's payment approval.

Your data

Get a free audit of your last 3 months